Posts Tagged ‘War’
Brothers (2009)
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009
Made plans in a bar the night before to go see one of a few movies. Arriving at the theater I thought we were seeing Up In the Air (2009). Being in the mindset for a comedy and sitting down to Brothers was a sucker punch.
The best sucker punch ever. The movie is intense. It’s gritty. It’s personable. It hits close to home. It locks you in and doesn’t let go until the credits roll. And even then it just lets you out of the theater, days later the movie is still rolling around in your head looking for an answer that doesn’t seem to be coming.
As long as you’ve seen the trailer, this next part won’t spoil anything. If you’ve yet to see the trailer, don’t! The movie would be better having not seen it. It’s over manipulating, over Hollywood-ing, and reveals story that is deftly laid out in the movie itself. Departmental support enhanced the story. The make-up is great, though subtle. I have no idea how they got body markings that realistic. The score was somber without dragging you down. The location was cold and stark with snow in almost every exterior. Everything seemed to be placed in a way to allowing acting to amplify story.
The audience is aligned with the characters. Viewer knowledge is limited to that of the characters. Meaning at times you know no more then anyone on screen, and at times you know something you wish everyone on screen knew what everyone else on screen knew. It created sympathy and frustration for characters who are harboring truths from others and for those whose truths are not being heard. A surprise was the acting of the two daughters, Bailee Madison and Mare Winningham. They are working with some of the most accurate dialogue for a kid that I’ve heard. The joke at the dinner table is perfectly executed by everyone involved. And both can cry on cue, which is always impressive. Tobey Maguire has his best performance in a long time if not ever, and lost more weight then Jenny Craig could. Jake Gyllenhaal and Natalie Portman were great in supporting roles highlighting Sam’s struggle to find the human side in himself again. Hoping to help him recognize the life before him as worth fighting to have back. It is not a movie about war, but a movie about brothers, which sounds dumb considering the title. The idea is introduced early on but buries itself. It transfers from the support of a brother at home to brothers in war back to a role reversal of familial brothers. In the depths of Sam’s personal battle the idea resurfaces as a final hope of survival.
Unless you’re my Mother, who would hate the movie and scold me for telling her to see it, you should go see Brothers. Lose the lower third and ticker, bring the newspapers to life, and watch it with a pillow. If you hurry up and see it at AMC 16 in Burbank, CA like we did there is an added bonus. A speaker popped in a constant steady rhythm throughout the entire film. Like a single droplet of water falling, it brought a whole new level of agitation and frustration to the viewing.
“Elephant!”
“Only the dead have seen the end of war…”
Tags: movies, Oscar?, Review, War
Posted in Review, movies | No Comments »
The Hurt Locker (2009)
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009
My knowledge of this film was limited when I sat down to watch:
- Directed by a woman
- Written by a reporter imbedded with an EOD unit
- Shot on location (turns out this isn’t true, but Kuwait and Jordan are close)
- It’s the unit a friend of mine was in for three years
The unique perspective of a journalist second one is reason enough to watch. When the movie was originally released the title had buzz. I assumed (made an ass out of you and me, or really just me) it was horror/gore. No idea why. But now it is Christmas time and screener season and a perfect time to watch.
The movie could have been stronger, but it still stands above a lot of war movies out there. A glimpse into a dangerous unit some don’t even know exists. Handheld super 16? Okay, sounds fun. Freestanding scenes written to get the most out of the moment? Excellent*. A non-narrative character film? Fitting.
(*Thinking of the scene with the little building and flat tire. Which was well done for dramatic purposes, and I liked it while watching it. The second time I though about it though there seemed to be a lot of flaws and dumb things going on.)
The characters are garnishing a lot of attention, especially SSgt. William James. Having not been in the unit nor the service I’ll withhold judgment on if he’d be allowed in that unit with his techniques. As far as the character goes, it worked for me. There wasn’t as much character development in the rest of the unit. Spc. Owen Eldridge was as interesting to me as the lead was. 
It would have been an effective study to develop alongside fulfilling the opening quote through James. The best part of the lack of a real storyline was the sense of the mundane life of a soldier. Even with their daily routine consisting of disarming unknown bombs and being shot at. There is no happy heroic arch, it is day after day after day. Seems accurate from the stories I’ve heard.
That is not to say that the film is boring. That’s the beauty of following the Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) unit. It’s suspenseful, and the more you get to know the characters the more you are rooting for the title to reach zero days left in Bravo Company’s rotation. The movie hits you deeper when you remember that the actors are portraying a unit that is currently living what you’re watching. Reflecting upon the film has made me like it less.
It’s a good movie. Worth watching. Worth taking the time to digest. Worth discussing afterwards. And like we did, you can start with the music used in the final scene. Because, while everything seemed to fit up until that moment, oh my goodness was it a pretty bad choice.
“The rush of battle is often a potent and lethal addiction, for war is a drug.” –Chris Hedges
Tags: movies, Oscar?, Review, War
Posted in Review, movies | No Comments »
Inglourious Basterds (2009)
Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009
a.k.a. Once Upon a Time in Nazi Occupied France (the previous spaghetti western meets WWII title)
This needs to be prefaced. After having just watched John Dillinger do his thing in Public Enemies I wasn’t all that excited to watch Tarantino do his to WWII.
The movie started with the expectation of being turned off a half hour later, but the opening scene sucked me in. It was a smart way to introduce the language use in the movie. Had amazing, seldom seen, pacing and perfectly timed reveals building the tension. Then triggers started being pulled. Yup, a Tarantino product. Luckily that comes with a lot more good then it does gore. The opening scene alone meant I’d see the film through to the end. But I’d have my computer open for distraction.
Almost any scene I watched was great. I’m going to go out on a limb and say that there were even more good ones in between that I missed. Finally, shortly before Chapter Five, my attention got sucked in to fully focus.
Shortly after moving out here my roommate came home with the script and (with my permission) told me all about it. I am far from a historian, but oddly protective of WWII and its accuracy. So the ending was just the completion of a story arch, and irked me a bit. I’m hoping there were at least some who got to see it not knowing the end. The way it was intended for. Knowing what really happened in the war and having their minds implode when watching the finale of the film.
What I saw early in the movie was good. The entire ending was entertaining. At some point I should finish watching all the pieces in the middle. The more I think back on it the more I liked the movie, I’m sure there’s a breaking point at which time I’ll go back to my previous opinion.
“I love rumors! Facts can be so misleading, where rumors, true or false, are often revealing.”
Tags: movies, Oscar?, Review, War
Posted in Review, movies | No Comments »
Atonement (2007)
Sunday, September 27th, 2009
Atonement had a lot of leftover buzz from the Oscars when I sat down to watch it. In my opinion it held up, played with telling a narrative from a limited immature view and had tons of fun with sound and music.
Keeping in mind that I really enjoyed the film, it lied to me. Well, marketing lied to me. It’s not a love story, it’s telling the story of the narcissistic Briony (note: I’m pretty sure some critic said that way before I ever sat down to watch the film). As soon as I realized this I was already a bit peeved at marketing in the States.
Rather than go into that, lets look at the fact that the film starts off completely unbelievable. No child holds the attention span to write out a completely comprehensible play. When I was that girls age, well I don’t know her age but when I was that girl’s height, I was putting together single frame comics. When I got a three frames put together with a giggle at the end it was a stroke of genius and the high point of my concentration for the month. How am I supposed to believe anything out of this little girl’s typewriter? It takes every stereotype of the younger sibling and leads you to believe their contrived little minds only to show you three scenes later that you fell for it. I do not like being laughed at by a DVD.
To further confusion, this is a period piece in a country that I have not lived in. There needs to be a handy booklet so I know what slang, modes of transportation, and fashion means what when it plays on screen. I’m assuming tuxedos are good high class people at all the times. But there is a character with greased back hair and a mustache. Normally sets off a trigger screaming “creepy!” But this is old timey England, maybe creepy was th
e style and what the guy was saying to that girl was sincere and sweet, not molester uncle style.
Atonement lied to me repeatedly and I cannot trust it nor its marking department, but we are still friends. In fact if I’d known about the contriving little Briony at the center of the film, I probably would have sat down to watch it a lot sooner.
Tags: Love Story, movies, War
Posted in movies | No Comments »